Defending IPL From Ambush Marketing Strategies

Introduction

Sports play a massive role in everyone’s lives as a source of entertainment and unparalleled passion, contributing to 5% GDP of world’s economy[1]. Sports industry is one of the biggest industries across globe now owing to people’s increasing interest in the same. One such example is the popular Indian Premier League of cricket in India. It’s not an unknown fact that IPL is a great boost to the commercial powerhouse that attracts various investors and sponsors. The IPL’s growth and economic viability, like any commercial project have resulted in a greater focus on safeguarding intellectual property (IP) rights. IPL is not just restricted to production and manufacturing of sports related items, but is also a platform for originality, conceptualisation and creativity. IPL is a prime example of how IP rights are essential for preserving a sporting event’s commercial area  while fostering innovation and creativity.

Ipl As A Brand

For the IPL 2023, the Board of Control of Cricket in India (BCCI) published certain guidelines[2] to protect IPL as a brand and provided safeguards on commercial and non-commercial use of proprietary names, proprietary marks and audio-visual representation of matches. The branding of IPL was done with a view to reward participation of sponsors, merchandisers and investors and to mitigate activities that damage these stakeholders’ exclusive rights. The IPL IPR is protected by the means of Trademark, Design as well as Copyright act along with protection against signal theft and terms and conditions under which IPL match tickets can be sold on the basis of which people are allowed to enter the stadium. Without IPL license, it is illegal to (i) use the IPL Names and IPL Marks in a way that could mislead the public about a commercial relationship with the IPL, or (ii) duplicate or distribute goods protected under IPL IPR in the course of business[3]. It is strictly prohibited to use IPL names and marks without license in a way of promotion or advertisement goods, business or any service. Falsely representing or implying any affiliation, endorsement, sponsorship, or other similar relationship with the IPL through the use of IPL IPR is also prohibited[4].

[Image Sources : Shutterstock]

IPL

Meaning Of Ambush Marketing

Effective marketing includes a strategy that makes the consumers remember the message content as well as helps them attribute the message content to its intended source. The most effective times for the transmission of this communication are during sporting events. As a result, businesses buy the right to advertise their goods inside and outside of event venues to strengthen their brand reputation. Due to competitors’ purposeful attempts to overshadow reputable sponsors, consumers are more likely to be confused about official sponsorship, known as ambush marketing which is the practise of confusing consumers about the real sponsors of sports events. There are several reasons why ambush marketing is so prevalent in sporting events. It not only provides great marketing opportunities to the brands and the sporting event, but also, due to lack of any proper legalisation or judicial pronouncements on the same, it is easier for brands to take advantage of the same. Including a disclaimer in commercials is a common practise that serves as a cover for brands that practice parasitic marketing. For instance, Pepsi Cola applied a disclaimer in the National Hockey League that read, “We are not an official sponsor and have not paid for the affiliation with the event.”[5] These disclaimers turn out to be a loophole, allowing the non-sponsoring brands to get away with using such tactics. Additionally, because the product being sold is different from that of the sponsoring brand, such brands easily avoid claims of passing off, causing the latter to suffer significant losses. Ambush marketing can be further categorised into two types:

  • Direct ambushing: In direct ambushing, the brands intentionally use the name, title or logos of popular sporting events so as to show some sort of direct association with the event, despite not owning any sort of licensing or merchandising rights. This creates an opportunity for them to leverage on the event’s popularity.
  • Indirect ambushing: Indirect ambushing is further divided into two types:
  • Associative ambushing is the practise of non-sponsoring brands creating an impression in the public’s mind that they are somehow connected to the sport or the event, without actually mentioning the event.
  • The practise of incidental ambushing involves non-sponsoring companies flooding an event with so many of their own advertisements and promotional campaigns that they can easily lead consumers to believe they are the event’s sponsors.

Instances Of Ambush Marketing In Indian Sporting Events

Recently, during IPL 2023, some fans were allegedly prohibited from entering the Eden Gardens stadium as they were wearing the Mohun Bagan jersey[6]. When question, the team of Kolkata Knight Riders denied any claim saying that their only intent was to prevent ambush marketing and from consumers to see Mohun Bagan as an affiliate to IPL. This recent incident shows the prevelance of ambush marketing in IPL. However, not just IPL, but also big cricket events like Cricket World Cup are infected by ambush marketing as seen in an early instance of  Coca Cola v Pepsi in 1996[7] which is still continuing.

Coca-Cola was the Cricket World Cup’s official sponsor back then. Coca-Cola made a large financial investment to secure its formal sponsorship. Only to have Pepsi’s inventive marketing strategy give it a run for its money. Pepsi boldly developed a campaign with “nothing official about it” that captured consumers’ attention. Sachin Tendulkar and Courtney Walsh, among others, were recruited by Pepsi to take part in the campaign[8]. This was a direct ambush on Coca-Cola’s marketing strategies. In 2017, Jio telecommunications ambushed the match between Mumbai Indians and Sunrisers Hyderabad by inducing a Mexican wave in the spectators, despite Vodafone receiving the season’s telecommunication sponsorship[9]. Jio prevented Vodafone from showcasing its cellular services by forcing spectators to stand in the letter “JIO” setup.

Conclusion

In today’s competitive marketing landscape, ambush marketing has gained popularity among brands due to its creative flexibility and cost-saving advantages, While ambush marketing may have its pros, it also has its cons. Most people believe that ambush marketing is unethical and jeopardises the brand’s reputation. Not just that, it harms the business strategies of actual sponsors who have actually gone through the efforts of paying the sponsorship fee and are actual stakeholders at any sporting event.

However, I believe that the actual sponsors must receive actual protection from any sort of ambush marketing techniques through adequate IPR. Legitimate marketing strategies would be anything that is not against the law or the terms of the contract; nonetheless, its potential impact should be more openly acknowledged during discussions between event organisers and potential sponsors.

Author: Areena Kausar, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

[1] Nitin Srinivas, Role Of Intellectual Property Rights In Ipl: An Overview,    Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research (June 12, 2023, 2PM), https://www.ijllr.com/post/role-of-intellectual-property-rights-in-ipl-an-overview

[2] TATA Indian Premier League 2023, Brand and Content Protection Guidelines, Public Advisory Document (June 11, 2023, 12PM), https://bcciplayerimages.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/bcci/documents/1680174721009_Brand&ContentProtectionGuidelines.pdf

[3] Id.

[4] Id.

[5] Surath Bhattacharjee, Guerrilla Warfare in Sports Sponsorships: Analysing Ambush Marketing and Commercialisation of Sports (2019).

[6] Rahul Sadhu, Jersey war in IPL 2023: Black tapes on jerseys after Mohun Bagan-East Bengal fans stopped at Eden Gardens, KKR puts onus on IPL rules, Indian Express (June 12. 2023, 2PM),  https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/ipl/jersey-war-indian-premier-league-kkr-mohun-bagan-east-bengal-8623371/

[7] Naresh Pujari, Complexities of IPR in Sports Leagues: The Way Ahead? (2018).

[8] Id.

[9] Id.

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010