Grant of Paid Holiday On Voting Day

The Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as ‘The Act’) was amended in the year 1996. The amendment added a new section 135B which centered around the grant of holiday on the day of voting and without deduction of salaries of workers. In a nutshell it stated that a paid holiday shall be granted by an employer to every employed person who is entitled to vote.

The Right to Vote is a constitutional right that is guaranteed to every citizen of India who has attained the age of majority (eighteen years) and is not disqualified by the Constitution or any other law to cast a vote. This right cannot be exercised if voters are kept from voting on the poll day for reasons of work. Thus, receiving a paid holiday on the day of voting is a right of every employed person as laid down under section 135B of The Act.

VoteSection 135B comprises of four subsections that in essence state that an employed person who is entitled to vote for elections of the Legislative Assembly of State or House of the people shall be granted a paid holiday on the voting day. In case the employer fails to abide by the same, he/she shall be punished with a fine extending to five hundred rupees. One exception is also mentioned in Section 135B with respect to an elector whose absence might cause danger to his employment or result in a significant loss of income. Section 135B would not apply to such an elector.

The Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training) on 10th October, 2001 via an Office Memorandum issued certain guidelines with respect to the closing of Central Government Offices including industrial establishments on the poll day. The guidelines stated that such organizations shall be granted a holiday with respect to the general election to Lok Sabha or State Assembly Elections. In case of bye-elections, only bonafide electors and electors who are ordinarily residents of a particular constituency wherein general election or bye-election are scheduled to be conducted but are employed in any Central Government Organisations or Industrial Establishments located outside the constituency, shall be granted special casual leaves for enabling them to exercise their Right to Vote. The guidelines also commented on the scenario of local body elections; reasonable adjustments in order to facilitate bonafide voters to vote, like government employees to be permitted to either come to the office late/leave the office premises early or be granted a short leave. Those who are on Election Duty should also be given holiday(s) on poll day(s) and or any such holidays that are reasonably required by them in order to commute from one place to another to perform their Election Duty.

Despite the existence of a law governing the grant of paid holidays and guidelines issued by the Department of Personnel and Training, many employees are denied paid leave(s) on poll day(s). The Department of Personnel and Training keeps on issuing Office Memorandums as and when elections approach in order to mandate the grant of paid leaves to employees.

Even the Election Commission of India had issued a letter on 30th March, 2009 post directions from the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Panaji to take prompt actions with respect to granting of holiday on the day of poll in case of a general election and bye-election to the House of People and State Legislative Assemblies after a writ petition for the same had been filed before the Hon’ble High Court by Goa MRF Employees Union. The letter intended to explain and elaborate on the meaning of section 135B of the Representation of People Act, 1951 by discussing a situation wherein a person is ordinarily a resident of a particular constituency and is a registered elector in the same but is currently employed somewhere outside the constituency. In such cases, too Section 135B would apply and the employee would be granted a holiday on the day of the poll in the constituency in which they are ordinarily a resident so as to not violate the person’s Right to Vote. Further, it was stated that the application of Section 135B shall also extend to daily wage and casual workers. They too would be entitled to a holiday without deduction of their wages on the poll day.

A writ petition was filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras by M. Ahamed Shahjahan seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus in order to direct the respondents to comply with Section 135B of the Representation of People Act, 1951 and grant paid holiday to casual labourers. The petitioner pointed out that employers usually do not grant paid holidays to their employees on the election day and hardly any action is taken against those who violate Section 135B. The Election Commission noted that this could be because the fine is so trivial that it fails to act as a deterrence. The Hon’ble High Court ordered the State Government and the Election Commission to issue notifications in order to spread awareness about the right of employees to have a paid leave on the poll day and in case such right is violated and a complaint is made, criminal proceedings may be instituted against the wrongdoer employer.

In a case of Raptakos Brett Employees’ Union v. Brett and Company Ltd., the respondent argued that the employer did not have a public duty to grant paid leave to employees on the day of the poll. The Hon’ble Madras High Court found no substance in this argument and held that under Section 135-B of the Act, employers are required to give a paid leave to employees on the day of the poll. As mandated under Section 135-B of the Representation of People Act, 1951 employers cannot and shall not choose to deny paid holidays to their employees. Following the addition of Section 135-B to the Act, any citizen who works in an establishment can file a complaint with the Hon’ble High Courts or the Apex Court under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution regarding a violation of a fundamental right with respect to participation in the democratic election process, and not being granted paid vacation as required by the said Section. employees paid time off.

Conclusion

Grant of paid holiday on the poll day is necessary for exercising the Right to Vote. The right of employees to be granted paid holiday(s) on election day is provided under Section 135B of the Representation of People Act, 1951. Any transgression committed by employers with regard to election and grant of paid holiday is subjected to penalty as per Section 135B. This provision is still not known to many people leading to deprivation of paid leaves on election day to employees which in turn leads to many of them being unable to cast votes. There have been numerous judgments by courts addressing the issue of denial of paid holidays to employees on voting day. Various notifications issued by the Election Commission and ministries like the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions help in spreading the much-needed awareness about this right of employees.

Author: Sonakshi Pandey – a student of Symbiosis Law School (NOIDA), in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010