Delhi High Court Prohibits ‘Franchise Byte’ from Uploading YouTube Videos Featuring the ‘WOW! MOMO’ Brand

The Delhi High Court prohibited Franchise Byte from using the trademark “WOW! MOMO” and ordered it to remove all Wow Momo-related videos and content from its website and YouTube channel.

Wow! Momo

Wow! Momo is a fast-food restaurant chain headquartered in Kolkata and is operated by Wow Momo Foods Private Limited. Its specialities include a variety of Momos and momo-based desserts. Wow! Momo has almost 300 locations in 17 cities.

Franchise Byte

It is a B2B service based in Bangalore. This franchise consultant service provides franchise business opportunities in India and assists in locating information about Top Franchise Brands and connecting with them.

WoW Momo Foods Private Limited v. Franchise Byte

Facts

Wow! Momo, the plaintiff, alleged that Franchise Byte had utilised the registered trademark “WOW MOMO” on its website, leading to trademark infringement. Additionally, the plaintiff claims that the defendant’s website misleads individuals into thinking that Wow! Momo is providing franchises through Franchise Byte, deceiving the general public. The allegation is made about a You Tube video in which representatives of the defendant’s website promoted franchises for Wow Momo’s business. Wow! Momo seeks a permanent injunction to restrain Franchise Byte from using or publishing any content with the trademark “WOW MOMO” or any similar mark identical to the plaintiff’s registered trademarks. The plaintiff also seeks the removal of specific posts on YouTube and Franchise Byte’s website.

[Image Sources: Shutterstock]

Wow MOmo

Court’s Decision

In issuing summons in the case, Justice Shankar stated that if an ex parte order fails to be granted in favour of Wow Momo, the defendant’s website will continue to mislead the public at the expense of the former.

The following interim directions are issued until the next hearing date.

  • The defendant is not allowed to use, share, or promote any videos featuring the trademark “WOW! MOMO” or any similar mark that might mislead or deceive viewers, as it resembles the plaintiff’s registered trademark for any purpose.
  • The defendant must eliminate all content related to the plaintiff and any mention of the trademark “WOW! MOMO” from the website www.franchisebyte.com.
  • Additionally, all videos referring to the plaintiff or the registered trademark “WOW! MOMO” must be removed from the defendant’s YouTube channel.
  • Furthermore, the court has mandated that the defendant reveal the identities of all individuals to whom they had purportedly granted franchises of the plaintiff and the earnings gained from such actions.

Conclusion

The allegations of Franchise Byte using Wow! Momo’s trademark on its website and YouTube channel brings attention to the impact of digital platforms in perpetuating trademark disputes. The lawsuit has serious legal ramifications for Franchise Byte and could result in severe consequences. Moreover, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of safeguarding trademarks for businesses and protecting brand identity. This legal conflict highlights the crucial issue of trademark infringement and its implications on industries. The unauthorised use of registered trademarks can severely impact the brand’s reputation, which takes years of hard work to build and potentially mislead consumers. In this case, it not only affects Wow! Momo’s reputation also raises concerns about deceptive practices involving the public. In today’s digital age, online presence shapes public perception. The interconnectedness of the online world means that once something is posted, it can quickly spread, and the easy accessibility of such information causes severe damage to a brand’s reputation.

Author: Aditi Sharma, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at  Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

References

  • https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2023/10/30/delhi-hc-grants-interim-injunction-to-wow-momos-foods-private-limited-legal-news/
  • https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-FranchiseByte-youtube-videos-wow-momo-trademark-241169?infinitescroll=1
  • Wow Momo Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. FrachiseByte, CS(COMM) 778 of 2023

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010