Buy Back of Securities under the Companies Act, 2013


Ever since the inception of the Corporate form of business, the world has seen a rapid proliferation of companies. The various advantages that result from choosing the company form of business over sole proprietorship, partnership or LLP are a significant reason why we see so many companies around us in the present day. The significance and popularity of the company form of business have increased to such an extent that recently, it was reported that Apple Inc. had attained a net worth equal to the Gross Domestic Product of 7 countries! Such a huge scale of achievement has not only been unprecedented but will always remain out of reach of other forms of business due to numerous structural limitations that these forms of business suffer from. By transcending the limitations of a traditional brick-and-mortar shop and entering into a field of cross-border presence, the corporate form of business is definitely here to stay.

[Image Sources : Shutterstock]

Companies Act

Just like cells are the basic units of life, shares are the basic units of a company. How the company manages these basic units is one of the most fundamental factors deciding what the public thinks of it and where is the future of the company headed. If a company performs well, a high share price reflects its efficiency. If a company is struggling, the descending trajectory of the share price graph tells the world that the company is not worth its money. At the end of the day, it boils down to whether the decision of a company increases its share price or not. The success or failure of any given decision taken by the management is measured by its impact on the share price of the company.

Considering the significance attached to share price, companies strategize to achieve a high valuation which would have a positive impact on its share price and thus, would create a favourable perception of the company in the market. While some do it by earning, some companies take alternative routes to achieving the same destination. It is here that the scope for malpractices and foul play increases. The Companies Act, 2013 intends to keep a keen eye on the actions of the company and regulate their actions so as to avoid any sort of injustice or fraud with the stakeholders.

One of the ways a company can manifest confidence in its working is by returning excess money to the shareholders. By doing so, it sends a message that the result for which money was raised could be accomplished by the company by using lesser resources. For decades, this strategy has proven to rekindle a spark of confidence in the hearts of the shareholders and reinforce their faith in the company’s management. The action through which the company returns money to the shareholders is referred to as  “Buy Back of Securities”.

The concept of securities involves the company raising money from the public. The issue and allotment of securities to the holder evidences the company’s action of raising money for a specific purpose. The concept of buy back involves the company reversing this action by returning the money which it had raised in exchange of the security which it had alloted. The company basically says, “We don’t need your money anymore. We have accomplished the same result with less resources and more efficiency”. From the point of view of a stakeholder, this action of the company evokes a huge amount of trust.

However, not all buy backs happen because the companies are efficient. Some companies, despite their inefficiency and mounting losses aim to show to the world that they are standing on their feet while in reality, their knees have buckled under the pressure of competition. In such situations, companies may misrepresent the actual state of their affairs. This situation is addressed by the Companies Act, 2013 that lays down exhaustive provisions for companies intending to buy their securities back from the market. Except for due compliance with clearly set-out conditions, no company has the authority to buy its own securities back as mentioned in Section 67 of the Companies Act, 2013.

The Law Relating to Buy Back of Securities under the Companies Act, 2013

The rationale behind introducing a law for buyback of securities was beautifully expounded by the House of Lords in the case of Trevor vs Whitworth[1]. In this case, Lord Watson stated that it is important to restrict companies form exercising unfettered power when it comes to buy back of securities. If these restrictions are not put in place, the companies may “traffick” their own securities in an attempt to wrongfully influence the price of shares in the market. This situation is unfavourable not only for the shareholders, but also for the long term sustainability of the company that runs on public money in most cases.

Section 67 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that no company limited by share capital or no company limited by guarantee having share capital can exercise the power to buy back its own shares unless a consequent reduction of share capital is effected. This section resembles Section 77 of the Companies Act, 1956 which stated the exact same thing with minor modifications. The need to prevent a company from exercising unfettered power regarding the purchase of its own securities from the public, therefore exists not since 2013, but since 1956. Till the year 1999, the law strictly prohibited the company from purchasing any of its securities no matter what. It was only in the year 1999 the the Companies (Amendment) Act was passed and the government allowed companies to buy back their own securities subject to certain specified conditions. Sections 77A, 77AA and 77B were inserted in the Companies Act, 1956. Today, we know these provisions under Sections 68, 69 and 70 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Section 68 of the Companies Act states that the company may buy back its own shares, subject to fulfillment of specified conditions wither from its free reserves, or from its securities premium account or from the proceeds of issue of any other kinds of securities. Section 68 is a non-obstante clause. It overrides every other provision of the Companies Act, 2013. Furthermore, Section 69 requires the company to transfer an amount equal to the nominal value of securities bought back to the Capital Redemption Reserve (CRR). Section 70 of the Companies Act, 2013 lays down the situations in which the company would not be allowed to buyback its own securities. The three sections lay down the following reuqirement ot be fulfilled by the companies intending to buy back their own securities:

  1. The Buy Back needs to be duly permitted by the Articles of Association of the Company
  2. The company should obtain the permission for buyback from the sharheolders by means of a special resolution passed in the General Meeting. The buyback represents no more than 10% of the company’s paid-up equity capital and free reserves, and it has been approved by the Board of Directors via a formal resolution;
  3. Company buybacks may not exceed 25% of the sum of paid-in capital and free reserves.
  4. The reference to 25% in this paragraph shall be understood with regard to its total paid-up equity capital in that financial year in relation to the buy-back of Equity shares in that financial year;
  5. After the buyout, the company’s total debt, including secured and unsecured, cannot exceed twice its paid-in capital and its free reserves. The Debt-to-Equity Ratio may be loosened by the Central Government for a certain category of enterprises, but not for any individual company.
  6. All of the shares or other instruments on the buyback list are current in their dividend payments. In line with the rules established by the Securities and Exchange Board in this regard, the company may repurchase its shares or other designated securities trading on an established stock exchange.
  7. Each buyback must be completed within 12 months of the date of the Special Resolution or Board Resolution, as applicable.
  8. No buyback offer shall be issued according to this subsection 68 (2) for a period of 1 year beginning on the date on which the prior buyback offer expired.

Critical Analysis of the Concept of Buy Back

The Companies Act, 2013 allows a company to buy back its shares for various reasons such as returning surplus cash to shareholders, improving the financial ratios, reducing the number of outstanding shares, and preventing a hostile takeover. However, it is important to note that buyback should not be used as a tool to manipulate the market price of shares. The Companies Act, 2013 has set a limit on the maximum number of shares that a company can buy back. The limit is 25% or less of the aggregate of its paid-up share capital and free reserves. This limit ensures that the company does not exhaust its resources on buyback and has sufficient funds for its operations. The Companies Act, 2013 does not allow a company to fund its buyback through borrowed funds, except for certain cases such as debt securities. The company can only use its free reserves, securities premium account or proceeds from the sale of assets to fund its buyback. The Companies Act, 2013 lays down a detailed process for buyback of shares.

Author: Archi Ghiya, A student at  Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.


  1. Securities and Exchange Board of India. (2018). Buyback of Securities.
  2. Ministry of Corporate Affairs. (2018). Companies Act, 2013.
  3. Institute of Company Secretaries of India. (2019). Buyback of Securities.
  4. Bajaj Finserv. (2022). How to buyback shares in India?
  5. Economic Times. (2021). What is a share buyback and how it works.

[1] (1887) 12 App Cas 409

Leave a Reply



  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010