Taxing of Digital Assets As Per Budget 2022


The creator of Bitcoin, the first cryptocurrency to enter the market in 2009, went under the nickname Satoshi Nakamoto. Following that, a number of cryptocurrencies were introduced, with Bitcoin Cash, Ripple (XRP), Litecoin, and other well-known coins among the most widely used ones. As of January 2022, there are reportedly more than 8,000 cryptocurrencies.

Cryptocurrency[Image source: Shutterstock]

According to a recent report by Nasscom and WazirX, the Indian cryptocurrency sector has grown rapidly in recent years. By 2030, it’s anticipated that Indians would have invested over $241 million in cryptocurrencies. India now has the most cryptocurrency owners worldwide.
Taxing digital assets is difficult for all governments but is especially difficult for underdeveloped nations (Pathways for Prosperity Commission, 2019). The least developed countries’ current tax systems fall short of meeting the urgent demand to tax digital platforms. The majority of businesses that provide digital platforms are often headquartered and registered in developed nations despite offering goods and services all over the world.
Due to their total absence of a physical presence and the fact that there are already tax treaties in place, there is continuous debate over how to tax solely digital businesses. Despite the fact that many traditional business models had been unable to endure the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, digital platforms were able to flourish. This led to fresh discussions regarding the need to tax the digital economy.

The government has now made it plain in the Union Budget 2022 that it would regulate cryptocurrency trading rather than prohibit it in India. The Income-tax Act has been suggested with a number of rules to control investments in cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and other virtual digital assets.1 These rules take effect in the assessment year of 2023–2024. As a result, beginning on or after January 4, 2022, any transfer of a virtual digital asset would be subject to taxation under the new rules suggested by the Finance Bill, 2022


Section 2 contains a new clause (47A) that adds an exclusive definition of “Virtual Digital Asset.” It means:

(a) “Any information or code or number or token (not being Indian currency or foreign currency), generated through cryptographic means or otherwise, by whatever name called, providing a digital representation of value exchanged with or without consideration, with the promise or representation of having inherent value, or functions as a store of value or a unit of account including its use in any financial transaction or investment, but not limited to investment scheme; and can be transferred, stored or traded electronically;

(b) Non-fungible Token (NFT) or any other token of similar nature, by whatever name called;

(c) Any other digital asset, as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official

Gazette specify.”

A cryptocurrency, an NFT, or another virtual digital asset as announced by the Central Government shall be considered a virtual digital asset. It won’t cover OTT platform subscriptions, mobile apps, e-commerce platforms, etc.

Subject to any criteria that may be included therein, the Central Government may, by announcement in the Official Gazette, exclude any digital asset from the definition of a virtual digital asset. The Central Government may have been granted such authority to ban the Central Bank Digital Currency or the first digital currency in India (CBDC).


Partner at Deloitte India, Saraswathi Kasturirangan remarked, ‘Virtual digital assets are subject to a 30% tax. There is just the acquisition cost deduction. No setoffs are allowed in favour of other revenue. A 1% increase in the sale’s price will result in tax withholding. For state government employees, the deduction for employer contributions to NPS rose from 10% to 14% in order to be on pace with central government employees. Not available to non-government personnel’.

One of the unique features of the budget is the introduction of rules for tracking and taxing so-called “Virtual Digital Assets” for the first time (VDA). A VDA is described as “any information, code, number, or token created using cryptographic techniques” in the Finance Bill. something that may be electronically sold, saved, or transferred. Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and Non Fungible Tokens are examples of VDA (NFT). However, observers have noted that the particular phrase (specifically, clause (47A) under Section 2 of the Income Tax Act, 1961) leaves the concept of a VDA open to interpretation.

The budget stipulates that any revenue derived from the transfer of any virtual digital asset should be subject to a 30% tax. It is also suggested to include TDS on payments made for the transfer of virtual digital assets at the rate of 1% of such consideration beyond a certain threshold in order to trace such transactions. To put that in perspective, a commission created by the Indian government in the middle of 2019 suggested outlawing all private cryptocurrencies, punishing anybody involved in their sale with up to 10 years in prison and heavy penalties.

The income that is proposed to be taxed under this regime must be calculated without taking into account any deductions (other than cost of acquisition) for any costs associated with the transfer or any allowances or set-offs for losses. Additionally, any loss associated with the transfer of such virtual digital assets would not be permitted to be offset against any other types of revenue. The Budget also aims to close every potential gap to stop such digital transactions from evading taxes.

However, the panel recommended that the government take into account introducing an official, RBI-backed digital money in India that would work similarly to banknotes. The government chose to legalise VDA transactions in contrast to the panel’s advice, but it also decided to issue a CBDC via the RBI. This government policy may be understood given that India is a major player in the cryptocurrency business. For instance, India is placed second in the global cryptocurrency adoption index for 2021. There are almost 20 million cryptocurrency investors in India, according to unofficial estimates. The budget plan for tracking and taxing cryptocurrency holdings makes perfect sense given the widespread acceptance of these assets among citizens. The Finance Minister has now made it clear that levying a tax on VDAs does not signify that the government has approved of themiii. Only the gains from it are now taxed.

Tax on giving away VDAs (for the purposes of section 56(2)(x) of the Act, a VDA is considered to be property). The proposed change will take effect on April 1, 2022, and will include VDA in the definition of “property” for the purposes of section 56(2)(x) of the Act.

Further, in absence of a corresponding section similar to section 50C or 50CA of the Act (which deal with fair market valuation (FMV) on transfer of immovable property and unlisted equity shares respectively), questions may arise on the valuation of VDAs for the purpose of computation of the taxable income. In absence of a corresponding section similar to section 50C or 50CA of the Act (which deal with fair market valuation (FMV) on transfer of immovable property and unlisted equity shares respectively), questions may arise on the valuation of VDAs for the purpose of computation of the taxable income. This issue is further amplified since the trading price of VDAs on different exchanges may be different and, in some cases, even a single day fluctuation in price could be very significant.

The Income Tax Act presently has the following clauses that control how digital assets are taxed:

• under Section 115BBH, Head Capital Gains
• Taxation based on other sources (Section 56(2)(x)).
• Section 194S, “Deduction of Tax at Source”


The digital economy is the area of the economy that is driven by the billions of daily connections made online between individuals, businesses, devices, data, and processes. The old ideas about how businesses are organised and how customers buy products and services are challenged by the digital economy.

Cryptocurrency and the other types of Digital Assets have become a massive part of this digital economy over the last few years and this trend will only grow considering majority of the transactions and real world work moving online to make life easier and more accessible for all. India has generally been late to adopt new trends and more so give them an official standing in law. This greatly holds back the immense potential all these new technologies like digital assets have in accentuating the growth of the Indian economy.

Author: Somil Shrivastava, A Student of  NMIMS, Mumbai, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to or at  Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

Leave a Reply



  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010