- Biological Inventions
- Brand Valuation
- Competition Law
- Constitutional Law
- Consumer Law
- Copyright Infringement
- Copyright Litigation
- Corporate Law
- Digital Right Management
- Educational Conferences/ Seminar
- Fashion Law
- Hi Tech Patent Commercialisation
- Hi Tech Patent Litigation
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property Protection
- IP Commercialization
- IP Licensing
- IP Litigation
- IP Practice in India
- IPAB Decisions
- Legal Issues
- Media & Entertainment Law
- News & Updates
- Patent Act
- Patent Commercialisation
- Patent Filing
- patent infringement
- Patent Licensing
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Marketing
- Patent Opposition
- Patent Rule Amendment
- Pharma- biotech- Patent Commercialisation
- Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations
- Protection of SMEs
- Section 3(D)
- Social Media
- Sports Law
- Telecom Law
- Trademark Litigation
Major Points Of The Deal
1. The clause on confined Companies contending Businesses One of the conditions was that Amazon would present a list of industrialists businesses, and Future would not vend the interest to these realities without Amazon’s authorization. The agreement banned 15 corporations from engaging in or copping effects in Future Group’s retail assets, including Reliance Industries, Walmart, Alibaba, Softbank, Google, Naspers, eBay, Target, Paytm, Zomato, and Swiggy.
2. Call- option Amazon was offered a call option to buy all or part of Future Coupons stake in Future Retail, which may be exercised from the 3rd year onward till the 10th year of the deal.
DEAL BETWEEN RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND FUTURE GROUP
The retail business contributes about 1/ 4th of RIL’s total profit. In August 2020, Mukesh Ambani’s RIL bought the retail and non-commercial business and the logistics and warehousing businesses of Future Group on a slump sale basis for a lump sum total consideration of Rs. 24,713 crores. Through the deal, Reliance acquired Future Retail which possessed Big Bazaar, fbb, Foodhall, Easyday, Nilgiris, Future Lifestyle Fashion Limited which operates Brand Factory, a fashion reduction chain, and Future Consumer Limited. Still, Future Groups’ financial and insurance businesses weren’t a part of the deal. The main reason behind Reliance’s investment in Future Group was to expand its offline retail presence and ameliorate perimeters by creating economies of scale.
STRUCTURE OF DEAL
Future Ventures is formed through the merger of listed firms Future Retail Ltd., Future Lifestyle Fashions Ltd., Future Consumer Ltd., Future Supply Chain Solutions Ltd., and Future Market Networks Ltd.
Future Enterprises will vend its retail, non-commercial, and warehousing businesses to Reliance Retail and Fashion Lifestyle Limited, a completely operated attachment of Reliance Retail Ventures Limited, as part of a depression trade.
Reliance Retail and Fashion Lifestyle will contribute Rs 1,200 Crore in a preferential stock immolation and Rs 400 Crore in Future Enterprises clearances. Similar temperance measures are being made to reduce the negative effect of the Covid- 19 pandemic on Future Group’s operations.
Future Group isn’t the only company impelled to vend its business as a result of the Covid- 19 outbreak. There’s a universal smash in combinations and accessions.
Legal issues arose after the trade of a business to Reliance by Future Group
• Singapore International Arbitration CentreIn the month of October 2020, Amazon filed a case Amazon.Com Nv Investment … vs Future Retail Limited on 6 August, 2021 for emergency arbitration against Future Group for forging an alliance with Reliance to vend Future Group’s retail, non-commercial, and logistics business without Amazon’s concurrence, which was needed according to an agreement inked between Future Group and Amazon in the month of August 2019. Amazon contended that the deal between Future Group and Reliance was invalid as it was violative of the agreement inked between Amazon and Future Coupons in 2019.
• The decision delivered in Singapore International Arbitration Centre
The Singapore arbitrator decided in Amazon’s favor and issued an interim injunction, suspending the Future- Reliance deal for 90 days but latterly extended. Amazon communicated to the Competition Commission Of India and the Securities Exchange Board of India as a result of this. It also went to the Delhi High Court to have the arbitration order enforced and to stop the Future- Reliance deal, which the Delhi High Court upheld. Future Group also appealed to the Singapore arbitration to have Future Retail removed from the interim order.
• The decision by Delhi High Court Future Group challenged the Single Judge Bench’s decision to the Division Bench, and the Division Bench stayed Justice Midha’s decision staying the Future- Reliance merger and attaching Future Group and Kishore Biyani’s assets. On February 8, 2021, the Court issued an interim decision stating that Future Retail wasn’t a participant in the arbitration agreement with Amazon and Future coupons. Amazon has sufficient power over Future Group, according to the Division Bench, which was a breach of the Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999. Three successive agreements involving Amazon and Future Group redounded in similar control. The clauses of the three agreements were scanned by the Delhi High Court. When taken inclusively, the Court set up that the agreements in favor of Amazon prima facie crossover from a guarding to a governing right. Similar control rights violated the Multi-Brand Retail Foreign Direct Investment Policy, which only allows foreign investment of over to 51 percent with government clearance.
• Supreme Court of India
Amazon approached the Supreme Court to appeal against the Division Bench’s order reversing the status- quo order by the Single Judge. The Supreme Court didn’t vacate the stay passed by the Division Bench, but it passed an interim order asking the National Company Law Tribunal to not allow the scheme of amalgamation. The bench made it clear that the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court shall not deal with the case since the Supreme Court had admitted the matter for examination.
The matter is posted for hearing before the Supreme Court on April 27, 2021. Still, if the deal between Future- Reliance doesn’t go through, Future Group will have no option, other than to shut down the shutters which will result in a loss of 11 lakh jobs, and around 6,000 merchandisers/ suppliers will lose their business. However, it would be a loss of Amazon’s investment as well as the Future Group would become bankrupt, if the deal falls through. Most probably, the Apex Court’s judgment will be grounded on the principle of business efficacy, which would conform to the commercial common sense of the situation, to give a structured result that would be just and profit all involved parties.
Author: PRIYAASHI RAJ, INSTITUTE: Bharati Vidyapeeth New Law College, Pune, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to firstname.lastname@example.org or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.