Increasing Global Financial Crime in the Post-Covid ERA

The pandemic has served as an incentive for financial criminals to take advantage of online transactions and threat the economic as well as financial stability of countries across the world. With the stemming financial crime post Covid, numerous challenges were faced in both intra-state and inter-state policy formulation to deal with these threats.

This article analyses the impact of Covid in the global financial world. First, it deals with impact on international cooperation to tackle the multiplying crime rates and policy formulations. Further, it deals with the approaches individual nations could undertake given their financial backing.

Impact of the pandemic on the international cooperation to combat financial crime

Global growth is an accumulation of country-level growth. While the policies formulated by the states to benefit their national growth and prosperity while combating the crisis should benefit at the domestic level, such policies should also benefit global financial growth and prosperity through coordination on some aspects. With the world dealing with an unprecedented event, policy formulation at the country level became pertinent to tackle the stemming financial crime, particularly money laundering and terrorist financing. It was realized that these problems need global cooperation. Information sharing is one such aspect of policy formulation. Financial imbalance is inevitable if inter-state mutual support is withdrawn.

The efficiency of international cooperation to combat financial predicament has been debatable across delegations. On one hand, concerns were expressed that delays in cooperation were under the possibility of being intensified with time due to remote working of authorities responsible to share information on the subject. Additionally, the law-enforcement agencies and supervisory authorities had prioritized their efforts. In such a scenario, formal cooperation in the form of mutual legal assistance to formulate a common plan was significantly impacted. In result, provisions for technical assistance in financial crimes arenas like Anti- Money Laundering and Counter- Terrorist Financing was also reduced or suspended.

Again, cross-border arrangements established in the recent years, though facilitated timely information sharing, the participants in these mechanisms had been a part of physical meetings and thus established trust. Authorities relied on physical documentation for exchange of supervisory information with the foreign counterparts and such exchange in a financial crisis with increasing financial crime posed challenges of coordination during the lockdown period.

On the other hand, a considerable amount of views suggest the contrary. The already established security systems, which had become stagnant with time allowed the authorities to share materials via email and other digital means across jurisdictions while the crisis subsisted. For people supporting this view, the pandemic brought forth opportunities to enhance information sharing. Repositories of policy measures devised by various states in response to the financial crisis facilitated by the pandemic were developed with the aim of states sharing their experiences. The impact and effectiveness of the policy measures were assessed on an international level to lay down the factors which answer the questions of whether, when and how to extend or amend those undertaken measures.

Along with cooperation, comes coordination. The global economy was already at a critical juncture even before the pandemic. The positive surprise of this crisis has been the accelerated speed and aggression of fiscal response to the financial as well as economic challenges which the pandemic posed.

The pro-creditor and pro-debtor approach to better tackle the stemming financial crime

Having dealt with the challenges that global cooperation is dealing with during the crisis, focus is now shifted upon the approaches that individual legal systems must undertake in order to best deal with the unprecedented event.

The pandemic left many debtors in a dilemma. With increasing losses, the liability to satisfy the creditors of their claims became a challenge that only few could undertake. While much strict legal compliances were put in abeyance considering their position, a huge number rather opted for bankruptcy fraud wherein the debtors concealed their assets in order to avoid having to forfeit them.

The legal systems across the world have been broadly classified on the basis of legal theory dividing the world into pro-debtor or pro-creditor systems. The pro-creditor approach focuses on the ability of the people to avoid losses resulting from default of the debtor. On the other hand, a pro-debtor jurisdiction aims to maximize the assets of the defaulter in order to increase the assets available for distribution. The choice between the two to deal with bankruptcy fraud should be based on the broad criteria of- the availability of insolvency set-off, receivables and payables, the scope of security interests if available, the availability of commercial trust and the traceability of delinquent money. These criteria do not exist in isolation but are only relevant when analysed with their efficient enforceability.

At this juncture, the criteria laid down for differentiation would assist in determining whether a pro-debtor or a pro-creditor approach would be suitable. Insolvency set-off is the alternate dispute resolution for insolvency proceedings where parties settle their claims by mutual dealings. In countries where such mechanisms can lead to effective results, a pro-debtor approach would maximize the assets of the debtor while providing relief that he will not take recourse to bankruptcy fraud. Similarly, presence of high commercial trust and efficient mechanisms to trace delinquent money would also favour a pro-debtor approach. On the other hand, stringent rules of security interest may tempt a debtor to resort to fraud, wherein the pro-creditor approach would serve the cause to secure the creditor.

Thus, the rise in bankruptcy fraud post pandemic has made different jurisdictions retrospect on their approach to financial laws within the ambit of bankruptcy laws in order to prevent the economy from suffering.


With the stemming financial crime across the world, the countries across the world would have to formulate ways and manners in which they could all share a common platform for exchange of information. It is impertinent for the nations to finalize the approaches they would be undertaking to deal with the same because notwithstanding the global consensus on a particular issue, the individual conditions in which a country operates is best known to it.

Author: Shailza Agarwal, Symbiosis Law School, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

Leave a Reply


  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010