The Legal Dilemma of Cryptocurrency in India


Cryptocurrency, also known as virtual or digital currency, is based on blockchain technology and has become a global phenomenon known to the majority of the people in the world. Through the medium of internet, the financial transactions are intended to take place strictly in terms of cryptographical functions. The cryptocurrencies can be transferred from one party to the other with the help of public and private keys which are secured by cryptography hence, making it difficult for any individual to counterfeit or forge the currency. The most fundamental characteristic of cryptocurrencies is that they paved the way for a decentralized digital cash system as compared to the old ways of government interference and control. This could be achieved with the help of blockchain technology which would, in turn, ensure the integrity of all the transactional data between the parties. Such decentralized structure would not only gain transparency but also charge minimum processing fees which would otherwise be charged at a high percentage by the respective financial institutions and in addition to this, it would be free from the claws of the government and the central authority as far as controlling is concerned.

cryptocurrencyCryptocurrency has its own set of pros and cons, on one hand, it provides easy transfer of funds with secured data and helps in protection from inflation while on the other hand, it could be used for illegal transactions in the name of the anonymous user and can convert the illegally obtained money into legitimate money with the help of the intermediaries. It could also result in financial losses if the user has somehow lost the private key to their respective wallet as a result of which, the wallet will remain locked with all the coins inside it. In addition to this, there is no refund or cancellation policy if the funds are mistakenly transferred to the wrong wallet address.

Regulation of Cryptocurrency

The most prominent issue that was to be considered by the Government of India was, ‘Whether Cryptocurrencies can be regulated by the Reserve Bank of India’? The central bank put forth its concerns with respect to the regulation of cryptocurrency as its anonymous nature could pose a threat to India’s banking system. The immense growth in the transaction volumes and adoption of cryptocurrencies in India could be witnessed especially after the demonetization was announced in November 2016 where the government emphasized digital payments which in turn led to online banking such as cryptocurrency. Later in 2017, the significant rise in the adoption of cryptocurrency forced the Reserve Bank of India and the Ministry of Finance to caution the general public about the potential risks and dangers associated with cryptocurrency declaring that they are not legitimate coins or currencies. It was evident by the actions of the Reserve Bank of India and the other regulating authorities that cryptocurrency trading was suspicious and ambiguous in terms of online transfer of funds. However, no legal action or enforceable directions in relation to cryptocurrency was taken by either of them.

There is no specific legal framework formulated by the government that would be applicable to cryptocurrency. Nonetheless, there are certain laws that seemed to be applicable to the use of cryptocurrency in India such as the Securities Contracts Act, 1956, Companies Act, 2013, Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. However, there is no certainty in terms of the applicability of these provisions of the respective acts. Also, as far as the trading is concerned, it is not clear as to how it will fall within the ambit of the existing laws or will the provisions extend to the wallet operators or the services which it provides to the interested parties. Subsequently in 2018, a circular was issued by the Reserve Bank of India prohibiting all the banks/entities be it commercial or small finance banks from dealing in virtual currencies or providing services that would further facilitate trading in cryptocurrencies. The reasoning put forth by the RBI for imposing the ban was not only to protect the consumers but also to maintain the market integrity and prevent money laundering. This was a major setback for all the business operations in India as far as the cryptocurrency exchanges are concerned.

The transactions were substantially reduced and the majority of the people who bought cryptocurrencies were forced to sell out their crypto assets along with cash before the banking facilities were shut. As a result, several crypto exchanges in India who were members of the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IMAI) challenged the circular issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) before the Supreme Court of India claiming that it is violative of the principle of fairness and equal opportunity. In addition to this, it was contended that the restrictions put forth by the RBI prohibiting banks from providing any banking services to the cryptocurrency businesses was, in turn, a colorable exercise of power under the guise of protecting the interests of the consumers and the impugned circular was “manifestly arbitrary, based on non-reasonable classification and it imposes disproportionate restrictions[1]

There have been close to six hearings since 2019, however, in March 2020, the Supreme Court in Internet and Mobile Association of India vs. Reserve Bank of India[2] lifted the ban on trading in virtual currency and calling them illegal which was imposed by the RBI through its circular. The court was of the opinion that the blanket ban which was imposed by the RBI on providing the banking services to cryptocurrency businesses was violative of Article 19 (1)(g) of the Indian Constitution where the practice to carry on any trade or business was hampered by the circular issued by the RBI[3]. In addition to this, the court observed that the RBI did not put in sufficient efforts to look for measures that are less intrusive in nature as compared to the blanket ban imposed against a whole industry. Therefore, there was absolutely no application of mind on part of RBI before the circular was issued.

The court also pointed out that although the RBI is vested with the power to form regulations which in turn derives its power from an act formulated by the parliament, the regulations cannot supersede the rights and freedoms guaranteed to the citizens by the constitution of India. The regulators cannot exercise their powers arbitrarily or disproportionately in terms of imposing a ban against a whole industry, as it is a matter of legislative policy and therefore, must arise from legislation only rather than a circular being issued by a regulator[4]. The powers vested with the RBI are formidable in the eyes of the relevant stakeholders and hold a special place as far as the economy of the country is concerned therefore, it needs to be exercised proportionately and in consonance with the fundamental rights guaranteed to the citizens by the constitution.

Current Situation in India

It is pertinent to note that in the current legal scenario and in the absence of any legal framework or regulatory body in India, crypto is not illegal rather is only unregulated. The status in terms of buying, selling, or trading cryptocurrencies in India is absolutely legal. In India, there are a number of players in the crypto exchange market like WazirX, ZebPay, Coinswitch Kuber, inter alia, who has also been key in supporting the government and helping investors join the bandwagon by self-regulating and obliging a thorough KYC check for all their investors. Recently, “The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill 2021” were about to be introduced in the Parliament during the budget session however, it was put to hold as the Government continued the discussions and meetings with all the relevant stakeholders before rolling out the bill. The bill aimed at prohibiting all the private cryptocurrencies and facilitates a regulatory framework for introducing the “official digital currency” which in turn would be issued/mooted by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

The RBI is planning to roll out its own official currency and is working on a project ‘Central bank digital currency (CBDC). However, before implementing CBDC and banning private cryptocurrencies a period of 3 to 6 months will be given to all the relevant stakeholders/crypto holders to liquidate their crypto assets post which the bill would strictly penalize/criminalize mining, trading, and issuing of cryptocurrencies. However, the same is going to take some time and in the meanwhile, the crypto market has seen a significant surge especially at a time when equity markets are touching new lows.


The Supreme Court verdict is fairly important and amounts to a small victory for all the crypto exchange entities in India. It is pertinent to note that cryptocurrency has gained popularity on a global scale. In addition to this, the transactions in terms of digital currency have grown volumes over the years in India. Imposing a blanket ban on cryptocurrency would not be the way to go forward as millions of Indians are considering this platform as a mainstream investment platform despite knowing the risks associated with it. Although currently, the uncertainty exists in terms of regulation, however, the government tried to introduce “The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill 2021” in the parliament which aimed at prohibiting all the private cryptocurrencies but the same was withheld for further discussions. Considering the global fame and immense potential associated with cryptocurrency, RBI is planning to roll out its own official currency and is working on a project ‘Central bank digital currency (CBDC).

There is no denying that India has had a fluctuating history with cryptocurrency with the country’s governing attitude towards crypto been oscillating to and fro between banning and regulating the same, for some time now. Moreover, as per reports, approximately, 60 to 70 lakh Indians have already invested in the crypto in India with there being no certainty with respect to the regulation of cryptocurrency. Amidst this, it wouldn’t be wrong to say that it is the need of the hour to regulate cryptocurrency with a coherent and well-structured regulation rather than banning them altogether especially since the market has seen a huge boom at a time when the country is fighting the Covid-19 pandemic as well as an economic downfall. This would also help the government tax the crypto trading that would consequently help in generating more revenue. In the present global scenario, India has a chance to be a global leader in framing the regulatory architecture for a new digital world. Comprehensive and appropriately regulated use of cryptocurrencies is an opportunity that the country must seize.

Author: Anirudh Agarwal (intern) a 5th Year student of OP Jindal Global University, and Sudhansu Sahoo (Legal Associate) at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys. In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at


[1]2020 (2) CTC 528


[3]Article 19 (1) (g) of The Constitution of India

[4] 2020 (2) CTC 528

Leave a Reply



  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010