Central Government promulgates the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance 2021

The Central Government promulgated the Tribunals Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021. The Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Bill, 2021 was introduced in the Parliament earlier this year but could not be taken up for consideration and passing. Exercising the power under Article 123(1) of the Constitution of India, the President promulgates this Ordinance.

Central Government promulgates the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance 2021Through this Ordinance, the Central Government brings some of the substantial changes in the existing framework of appellate bodies and transfer their functioning to other judicial authorities.

In the Cinematographic Act 1952, the ordinance transfers the appellate function of the Tribunals to the High Court amending Section 5C of the Act. Omitting the word “Tribunal” under sections 7A and 7C, it has been substituted with “High Court”. Section 2(h) which defines the Tribunal has been omitted. Moreover, clauses (h), (i), (j), and (k) of sub-section 2 of section 8 which defines the power to make rules have also been omitted.

In the Copyright Act 1957, section 2(aa) which defines the Appellate Board has been omitted. Clause (fa) will be re-lettered as clause (faa) where the Ordinance inserts “Commercial Court” defining it as, ‘for the purposes of any State, means a Commercial Court constituted under section 3, or the Commercial Division of a High Court constituted under section 4, of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015;’. Therefore, this Ordinance transfers the power of the Appellate Board to that of the Commercial Court or the Commercial Division of the High Court. Section 6 which speaks of the disputes to be decided by the “Appellate Board” will be substituted by “Commercial Court”. It omits Section 11 and 12 of the Act where the reference of the Appellate Board is given. The Ordinance substitutes the word Appellate Board with that of “Commercial Court” in sections 19A, 23, 31, 31A, 31B, 31C, 31D, 32, 32A, and 33A. Whereas, for the rectification of the Registrar under section 50, the “Appellate Board will be substituted by “High Court”. For the appeal against the order of the Registrar, the Ordinance provides a direct appeal to the High Court, where such appeal will be heard by a single Judge, where a further appeal will lie to a Bench.

In the Patent Act 1970, the Ordinance omits section 2(1)(a) and (u)(B) where the reference of “Appellate Board” is given. Omitting the word “Appellate Board or” from section 52 of the Act substantiates the point of transferring the power from Appellate Board to High Court. Wherever the words “Appellate Board” or “Board” are appearing, it is either omitted or is substituted by the “High Court” like in Section 58, 59, 64, 71, 76, 113, 117A, 117E, 151. Section 116, 117, 117B, 117C, 117D, 117F, 117G, and 117H will be omitted. All these sections relate to the Appeals to the Appellate Board.

In the Trademark Act 1999, section 2(1) (a), (d), (f), (k), (n), (ze) and (zf) shall be omitted. All these clauses deal with the functioning of the Appellate Board. The clause (s) which speaks about the rules made in the Patent Act will also include rules made by the High Court in relation to the proceeding before the High Court. In sections 10, 26, 46, 47, 55, 57, 71, 91, 94, 97, 98, 113, 124, 125, 130, 141, 144, 157, the Ordinance replaces the word “Tribunal” with that of “Registrar or the High Court, as the case may be,” and for the “Appellate Board”, replaces with “High Court”. Similar to that of Patent, this Ordinance omits all the sections under the Chapter heading of “Appeals”, except section 91, 94, 97, 98.

For the Geographical Indication of Goods Act 1999, the Ordinance transfers the power of the Appellate Board to High Court and replaces the word “Tribunal with that of “Registrar or the High Court, as the case may be,”. Such replacement has been done in sections 19, 23, 27, 31, 34, 35, 48, 57, 58, 72, 75. Few sections such as 2(1)(a) and (p), 32, 33, 48 are omitted where the reference to the Appellate Board has been mentioned.

The Ordinance brings similar changes to the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Right Act, 2001. Section 2(d), (n), (o), (y), (z), where the reference to the members and chairperson of the Tribunal has been mentioned, has been omitted. At places such as section 56, 44, 57, the word “Tribunal” has been replaced with the word “High Court”. Few sections such as 54, 55, 58, 59, where the reference to the Tribunals, its composition, and the procedure is mentioned, have been omitted.

The ordinance also brings changes to the Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002, The Customs Act, 1962, and the Airport Authority of India Act, 1994. In all these act the Ordinance has transferred the power of the Appellate Board to various Judicial Bodies. For the National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002, the Ordinance transfers the power to the Civil Court. In the Customs Act 1962, the Appellate Authority has been replaced with the “High Court”. For the Airport Authority of India Act, 1994, the “Tribunal” is replaced with “Central Government”.

This Ordinance also brings some of the changes in the Finance Act 2017. Providing substantial changes to section 184 which gives the power to the Central Government to make rules to provide for the qualifications, appointment, salaries and allowances, resignation, removal, and the other conditions of service of the Chairperson and Members of the Tribunal as specified in the Eighth Schedule. It added that an appointment will be made on the recommendation of Search-cum-Selection Committee which will consist of the Chief Justice of India or a Judge appointed by CJI, along with two secretaries appointed by the Government and one secretary of that department under which the Tribunal is set up. The Committee will also have one member who will be a retired Judge of the Supreme Court or the Chief Justice of the High Court, in case the Tribunal is Industrial Tribunal under Industrial Dispute Act 1947, Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals constituted under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. The Chairperson of the Tribunal shall hold the office for 4 years or till he attains 70 years of age and other members will hold for 4 years or till he attains 67 years of age. Those Tribunals whose power has been transferred were omitted from the purview of the Finance Act 2017.

Author: Saransh Chaturvedi (an advocate) currently pursuing LLM from Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law (IIT Kharagpur).  In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at aishani@khuranaandkhurana.com, Khurana And Khurana – Advocates and IP Attorney

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010