Differential State Regulations on Online Fantasy Sports Platforms

History and Overview

Prior to the promulgation of the Constitution of India, gambling in India was governed by the Public Gambling Act, 1857.

However, the popularity of horse racing was growing, and soon after, the Bengal Presidency, Act II of 1867, allowed for subscription, prizes, and staking on horse races. gameSimilarly, it was licensed in the Bombay Presidency under the Bombay Race-Courses Licensing Law 1912. After Independence, betting and gambling were listed under Entry 34 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution, thus empowering the states only to legislate upon the subject. Similarly, Entry 62 of the same list empowers the states for legislation for the taxation of betting and gambling as well. As a result, most states have different laws on the subject, albeit primarily based upon the original 1857 Act.

Differential Regulations in States

As it stands, every state in India, except Goa, Sikkim, and the Union Territory of Daman explicitly prohibits any sort of gambling, betting, or wagering on games of chance.
The states of Assam, Andhra Pradesh, Nagaland, Odisha, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana have placed restrictions on games of skill as well. The restrictions are outlined as under –


The legal status of paid games of skill while clear is confusing, as the Assam Game and Betting Act, 1970 prohibits all forms of betting or wagering on any game or sport, except horse racing and lotteries, as the Act had extended the original Bengal Act of 1967. However, it seems as though the Assam Act did not account for the 1913 amendment to the Bengal Act, which allowed for an exemption of mere skill. As a result, there exists no exemption or allowance for games of skill either and online fantasy sports platforms do not operate for residents in Assam.


The Nagaland Prohibition of Gambling and Promotion and Regulation of Online Games of Skill Act, 2015 is one of the most recent statutes, and consequently one of the most modern ones. The Act explicitly outlines what constitutes a game of skill to be one “where there is the preponderance of skill over chance, including where the skill relates to strategizing the manner of placing wagers or placing bets or where the skill lies in team selection or selection of virtual stocks”. Thus, the statute has clearly recognized the skill involved in online fantasy sports platforms.

However, under Section 7 of the Act, the statute has mandated a license to be obtained through the issuing authority for entities wishing to offer such games on online media and earning revenue for the same. This makes it extremely difficult for a new venture to operate whatsoever. Moreover, the rules under the Act, despite being notified, are not available online – thus posing compliance issues.

The fee for the license stands at ₹10 lakhs per game per annum or ₹25 lakhs per annum if an applicant wants to offer a variety of games, which is to be doubled after 3 years and remains valid for five years. Further, a 0.5% tax has also been provisioned under the rules. A host of other guidelines including KYC guidelines, foreign deposits, and banking requirements have made the license undesirable and most platforms, including Dream11, have skipped trying to get one

Odisha and Telangana

The Orissa Prevention of Gambling Act, 1955 bans all forms of games for money and betting or wagering where a “person intentionally exposes money or things of value to the risk or hazard of loss by chance”, except lotteries. Needless to say, online fantasy sports platforms are not allowed in Odisha.

The Telangana Gaming Act, 1974, explicitly prohibits any act of risking money, or otherwise on the unknown result of an event including on a game of skill.


Similar to Nagaland, Sikkim has also mandated the requirement of a license for an online gaming platform involving chance. However, the licenses mandate that the games shall be played from within the state of Sikkim itself only, and may only be offered within the physical premises of gaming cafés within the state of Sikkim through intranet gaming terminals. This requirement essentially rules out any platform which wants to operate outside of Sikkim, which is, basically, all of them. Online too licenses have been issued in the past decade, most likely for casinos operating within Sikkim which use newer online gaming machines.

Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Both of these states have recently passed amendments to their respective gambling acts.
Andhra Pradesh has taken a stern stance on the issue – as the exception for ‘games of mere skill’ has been done away with. The new AP Gaming Act has now plainly prohibited online gaming platforms involving money and issued notices to platforms such as Paytm to completely stop their practices.

Tamil Nadu, on the other hand, has promulgated an ordinance to expand on the existing law and taken online gaming platforms into its ambit of restriction – but continues with the exemption for games of skill. Thus, online fantasy sports platforms continue to operate within the territory of Tamil Nadu.


Impossibility of Regulation

The drafters of the Public Gambling Act way back in 1857 did not possibly envision betting and gambling to possibly be on a national or international level – it was perceived to be in houses and clubs and casinos. Neither the states envisioned so, and nor did the Constitution.
However, with the advent of the internet and rapid technological advancement, the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution itself has come of age. The Schedule does not envision what happens when a residuary subject, which comes under the Union’s legislative authority (like that of information technology), conjoins with a state subject (like that of gambling). Similar issues have arisen with the draft Data Protection Bill as well.

In the author’s opinion, the subject of online fantasy gaming, gambling, and betting, should be left with the Centre due to the lack of states’ control over it. Today, if one wants to enter contests on Dream11 while living in Odisha (or any other state where it is prohibited), they can do so easily by just entering an incorrect address while signing up for the platform. One can even sign up for gambling websites easily, and the Odisha Prevention of Gambling Act does not provide for any penalties for any such user, much like every other state act on the subject. Laws need to be significantly overhauled in order to have any prevention of online betting and gambling, which pose increased risks due to their ease of access.

Heavy Compliance Burden for Platforms

On the other hand, the current wide disparity in state-laws poses huge compliance burdens for these online fantasy sports platforms which operate at a massive scale – some even internationally. This is best seen in the case of Sikkim and Nagaland, where licenses are offered for the operation of online platforms, yet the biggest players have not jumped on board.
Additionally, apart from legal compliance, differential laws further result in users having varied rights and remedies against the platforms, resulting in ambiguity and confusion for the users when it comes to dispute resolution.

While the debate of whether online fantasy sports platforms host games of skill or chance has been settled to be of the former, there still exists no clear guideline as to what may constitute a game of skill. Ludo, for example, is being played online prize monies – which lies squarely in the grey area still. Without a clear guideline or test, innovation is stifled to a great extent as what may be legal and the core of one’s business today would be held to be criminal tomorrow.

The Sizzling Debate

As it stands, the subject is under intense litigation, legislation, and discussion from a host of different areas. In fact, during the time of writing this article, another petition was filed in the Delhi High Court to ban all such forms of online gaming and betting. The NITI Aayog to has released a draft for discussion on Guiding Principles for the Uniform National-Level Regulation of OFSPs in India. The Advertising Standards Council of India, following the same footsteps, has released guidelines for online gaming ads.
29 states – prohibited in 4, restricted in 2, confusing in all. It wouldn’t be a surprise to know that a Bill is tabled in the next Parliament session – it is the need of the hour anyway.

About the author:  Sudhansu Sahoo (Legal Associate), and Anubhav Gupta (Principal Associate- Taxation) at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys.  In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at sudhanshu@khuranaandkhurana.com.

Leave a Reply



  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010