Are Trade Secrets Safe in the Information Age?

In today’s digital age, information has grown to become a very strong tool – almost equivalent to money or power. Its free flow and distribution have led to knowledge (including the ability to create it) becoming an incredibly vital economic input.[1] With an exponential rise in the development of information and accessibility to it, the necessity to protect such information, which may often contain pieces sensitive to the survival and growth of an enterprise, has become incredibly important. Such information is known as a trade secret.

Broadly speaking, a trade secret is any confidential business information which provides a competitive edge to an enterprise. Such secrets range from information on production or manufacturing to that on industry and commerce. The un authorised use of such information is an unfair trade practice and is a violation of the trade secret.[2]Before the advent of the Information Age, protection of trade secrets was much simpler because the tools of thefts were much different than those today. Earlier, to commit theft of trade secrets, perhaps an employee could misappropriate lists or designs of a product or the company’s finances and disseminate them. Or if none of these methods were feasible, one could walk out of a company’s office with a truckload of confidential information at nightfall without the guards noticing. While these practices come handy as movie plots, they have been replaced by more technologically advanced and efficient methods which eliminate the necessity of physical presence or proximity to commit trade secret theft. For instance, cyber criminals could remotely infiltrate a computer system and obtain protected trade secrets. These secrets could then either be made publicly available over the internet for free or otherwise be sold.Other than cyber-crimes, today’s digital media is intelligent enough to capture digital trails, i.e. details about when and where information was created, last edited and accessed is easily available – both a boon and a bane.

As a consequence, businesses must now be more vigilant and protective of their trade secrets than ever. In furtherance of this, many nations have enacted statutes for the particular purpose of protecting trade secrets. However, India still does not have any legislation aimed at protecting trade secrets. Indian courts, based on principles of equity, have upheld that the protection of trade secrets and their violation is a tort in common law. This has typically been done by the application of contracts law. An example isJohnRichard Brady v Chemical Process Equipments Pvt. Ltd.[3], where the plaintiff had shared technical information and detailed specifications of a production unit of the defendant company, the Delhi High Court invoked a wider jurisdiction and awarded an injunction despite the absence of a contract of confidentiality between the parties to the suit.

While these remedies may work as tentative measures to keep a check on trade secret theft, India must enact a specific legislation for trade secrets. As a member of the World Trade Organisation and a signatory of the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs, India is bound to comply with all the instruments of and annexes to the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs)[4]. Article 1(2) of the Agreement[5] states that intellectual property shall include protection of undisclosed information. Further, Article 39[6] states concerns ensuring effective protection against unfair competition, as provided in Article 10bis of the Paris Convention[7], with respect to information which –

(i) is a secret not generally known or readily accessible;

(ii) has commercial value by virtue of secrecy; and

(iii) has been subjected to reasonable steps for ensuring its secrecy.

Moreover, Article 39 requires members nations to ensure that both natural and juristic persons must be able to prevent, within their control, the disclosure, acquisition and/or use of such information without their consent and in a manner contrary to honest commercial practice.[8] In a US-India Trade Forum in 2016, Indian representatives reiterated India’s commitment to strong protection of trade secrets. In furtherance of this, it was agreed that a toolkit be prepared for small and medium sized enterprises, highlighting the applicable laws and policies in better protection of such information. Additionally, a training module for judicial academies and further study into the various legal approaches to such protection was also recommended.[9] All of this has created hope for a well-established framework on trade secrets sometime in the near future.

While protections and remedies provided by courts and legislations continue to be of aid, businesses must take measures of their own, by way of internal policies and procedures, to ensure protection of their secrets –

(i) Stringent hiring and termination policies;

(ii) Limiting access to trade secret information;

(iii) Training employees on the importance of keeping trade secrets confidential and on how to keep them safe;

(iv) Risk assessment to determine how sensitive the secrets are, where the information is stored, who has access to it, and so on;

(v) Encryption of sensitive information.

The digital world is no friend to trade secrets and it is always best for businesses to assume that others will attempt to discover and appropriate their trade secrets. Making such an assumption will not only ensure that confidential information is safe but also will help in growing businesses and, in turn, the country’s economy.

Author:  Hrishikesh Bhise, III Year, B.A. LL.B. (Hons.), National Law Institute University, Bhopal, Intern at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys. In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at niharika@khuranaandkhurana.com

References:

[1] Susanna Davis, Introduction: Information, Knowledge and Power

[2] WIPO, What is a Trade Secret?,

[3]AIR 1987 Delhi 372

[4]1869 UNTS 299; 33 ILM 1197 (1994)

[5]Id., at art. 1(2).

[6]Id., at art. 39.

[7]21 UST 1583, 828 UNTS 305

[8]Supra note 4, at art. 39.

[9] RNA Technology & IP Attorneys, Protecting trade secrets in India (May 1, 2008), https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c83e8a6c-a02e-44ba-8723-94087d2e5e20

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010