Your Wedding Sangeet Won’t Violate Any Copyrights, Or Will It?

The Copyright Registry on August 27, 2019 released a public notification containing a much awaited clarification regarding public performance and sound recordings played during marriage ceremonies.

Weddings in India are a celebration of the sacred union between two people and in general, an extravagant affair for the parties. Ceremonies are conducted in grandeur fashion with splendid servings, bright colours and musical processions. Usually an unnoticed detail, but playing pre-recorded sound recordings by way of any medium during these ceremonies, as per the Copyright Act 1957, has always been considered a violation of the copyright subsisting in the owner’s work, until now.

Under Section 51 (a) (i) of the Copyright Act, 1957, “when any person, without a licence granted by the owner of the copyright or the Registrar of Copyrights under this Act or in contravention of the conditions of a licence so granted or of any condition imposed by a competent authority under this Act does anything, the exclusive right to do which is by this Act conferred upon the owner of the copyright, is considered an infringement of the owner’s copyright.[1]”In order to play music/pre-recorded songs at events/parties/hotels/social functions etc., for commercial purposes, one needs to obtain a license at a particular tariff from the Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. (IPRS), having exclusive authority over public performance rights and radio broadcasting rights.

This provision acts as a safety net for the owners who suffer pecuniary losses amongst other, when their work is illegally broadcasted/performed without their prior permission. However, the Act doesn’t confer absolute rights on the owner of a musical work by way of providing certain necessary exemptions where the infringement may be construed as innocent.  One such is mentioned under Section 52 (1) (za) wherein, the performance of a literary, dramatic or musical work or the communication to the public of such work or of a sound recording in the course of any bona fide religious ceremony or an official ceremony held by the Central Government or the State Government or any local authority is not infringement[2].

Marriage procession and its associated social festivities are included within the ambit of “religious ceremonies” for a better understanding of the provision and as per the new notification the Government makes it clear that IPRS will grant a Free of Cost License (FOC) for such requests[3].

(a) in an enclosed room or hall meant for the common use of residents in any residential premises (not being a hotel or similar commercial establishment) as part of the amenities provided exclusively or mainly for residents therein; or

(b) as part of the activities of a club or similar organisation which is not established or conducted for profit

As per the guidelines issued by IPRS, commercial establishments such as hotels, banquet halls, lawns etc. are not permitted to perform music publicly by any medium without a license, upon the payment of a royalty fee. The tariff varies for A Class cities such as Mumbai, Delhi/NCR, Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore, Hyderabad/Telangana, Goa, Ahmedabad, Pune, Chandigarh, Jaipur and Udaipur and the rest depending upon the hotel’s per room tariffs[4].

Although the notification is a welcome step by the Government, the situation still remains in a perplexed haze. Cost free license is only provided for indoor ceremonies, but the provision neglects in its consideration that wedding processions are majorly held outside, with hotels and banquet halls as the prime choice. Moreover, the obligation of obtaining such a license falls on which party, with either option contradicting the spirit of the recently issued notification. In order to determine the answer, a clarification is required on part of the Government putting the argument to rest once and for all and defining the ambit of Section 52 in respect of public performance of sound recordings. 

Author: Isha Tiwari, B.Com. LLB, Amity Law School, Noida , Intern at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys. In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at niharika@khuranaandkhurana.com

References:

[1] The Copyright Act, 1957 (PDF); http://www.copyright.gov.in/Documents/CopyrightRules1957.pdf; accessed on 31 Aug. 19

[2] Supra Note 1

[3]http://copyright.gov.in/Latest_Notice37.aspx; accessed on 31 Aug. 19

[4]https://www.iprs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/IHL-CL-Hotels-Guest-Houses.pdf; accessed on 31 Aug. 19

Leave a Reply

Archives

  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010