Amtek Auto Ltd. Restarts Insolvency Proceedings- Did Liberty House escape the Liability?

IBC encompasses the provision of an early insolvency process, the process for insolvency of a company which can be initiated at the time when an alarm is raised as to the default in repayment of loans by the Company. The provision is a boon to the creditors as they can claim for a resolution for payment of their debts well in advance instead of waiting for the news of liquidation of the company

The capital strategy for most of the big firms is Debt-Capital. These companies in a lot of cases turn out to have their liability side of the Balance Sheet overburdened with the creditors which leads to a scenario where the payment of principal amount and interest to the creditors is at stake. Amtek is one such company which has been in news for its early insolvency process on account of a default of payment to its creditors. Amtek Auto was one of 12 major companies that the Reserve Bank of India identified in June 2017 for bankruptcy. It was brought to Bankruptcy Court in July 2017 by State Corporation Bank. The company owes its financial creditors about 12,600 rupees. It also owes its operational creditors around Rs. 206 crores.

The Insolvency Timeline

Amtek group has a number of subsidiary companies; one of them is Amtek Auto which defaulted on bond repayments of close to Rs 800 Cr. in September 2015. Since then Amtek has been trying to sell various group businesses to reduce the debt in its books.

In 2017, an application was filed at NCLT for early insolvency process in respect of Amtek Auto on default of payment of INR 12,300 Cr. . Its unit, Amtek Global Technologies Pvt. Ltd, agreed to sell its plants in the UK to Liberty House group, the firm said in a filing to the stock exchanges on Friday.

In 2018, Amtek Auto Ltd became the first among the 12 large insolvency cases referred to the National Company Law Tribunal to get finalized, as the UK-based industrial conglomerate Liberty House emerged as the preferred bidder to acquire the debt-laden auto components firm.

NCLT Chandigarh approved UK based Liberty House’s resolution plan whereby Liberty House took up the responsibility to pay Rs 3,225 Cr. upfront to the financial creditors and proposed to infuse Rs 500 Cr. for stabilizing and improving operations. The resolution plan submitted by Liberty House Pvt. Ltd was duly approved by the Tribunal vide order dated 25th July 2018

The order was followed by a default in payment by the Liberty House in furtherance of which the Committee of creditors sought to invoke section 74[1] and 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in accordance with the resolution plan and contended that there is a lack of bonafide intent on the part of the company to execute the terms of the resolution passed by the adjudicating authority.

The Liberty House to justify such default came up with frivolous arguments. NCLT declined to entertain the application by the Liberty House contending that the difference between the book value and the liquidation value of Amtek Auto Ltd. is immoderate and the issue came in light for them only after the resolution was passed.

The committee of creditors refuted the allegations and stated that such Company bidding the highest to pay off the debt of Amtek Auto should itself have gotten the assets evaluated before undertaking the resolution

“Liberty House, the lenders have alleged, is seeking to “manipulate the statutory mandate of the code and reintroduce the mischief into the insolvency regime of the country which the code has sought to eradicate”. The committee of creditors also plans to file a civil suit before the appropriate court for seeking damages from Liberty House as the company had failed to comply with the terms within the stipulated time.”[2]

The beginning of this year witnessed the Liberty House being questioned as tot he compliance of the resolution by the National Company Appellate Tribunal and the Creditors of Committee were asked if they had any higher bid than the Liberty House as an option.

The scenario was followed by an application being filed by the financial creditors of the Corporate debtor with NCLT, Chandigarh claiming that the corporate debtor has failed to honor its commitment to comply with the requirements for the implementation of the approved plan and expressed its inability to comply with the commitment on one pretext or other.

The court held that there was clear default in implementing the Plan within the time stipulated in the Resolution Plan and the application was allowed in their favor.

The highlight of the year in respect to Amtek is that the lenders of Amtek Auto asked for the restart of insolvency proceedings following the act of default in payment by the lone bidder- Liberty House and the application was approved by NCLT, Chandigarh

The current situation is that the Amtek Auto Ltd. after almost two years of its first insolvency proceedings has started a fresh bidding process this month and gave out time till 28th, 2019 to the prospective bidders to come up with their resolution plans.

What happened to Liberty House?

Now, that Amtek Auto has been allowed by the court to restart the insolvency proceedings, does the liability of Liberty House end?

Well, the news has it that IBBI i.e. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India is seeking action against the Liberty house by moving to the Bankruptcy court for default in payment for Amtek Auto.

As mentioned above, the lenders filed an application for invoking Section 74 of the Code against the Liberty House and thus, the board moved to the Court against Liberty House under Section 74.

This is not the only incident where the Liberty House failed to make the payment but also in case of stressed steel company Adhunik Metaliks. The action against Liberty House is justified as it could not manage to pay the debt of the firms it planned to take over and failed to comply with the resolution plans, the non-compliance of which is punishable.

Conclusion:

IBBI is out there to get hold of all the frivolous bidders fiddling with the due process of law and to help quicken the recovery of banking funds locked in bad loans. This is an open warning to all the bidders in the market and the result of which will hopefully be Amtek Auto bagging a serious bidder and the financial creditors’ finally receiving their due.

Author: Vidushi Trehan, LL.M from Symbiosis Law School, Pune , Intern at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys. In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at swapnils@khuranaandkhurana.com

References:

[1] https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/lenders-seek-nclt-nod-for-restarting-resolution-process-for-Amtek-auto-119010901402_1.html

[2] http://www.newindianexpress.com/business/2019/may/04/ibbi-moves-court-against-flippant-bidder-liberty-house-in-Amtek-case-1972393.html

Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives

  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010