- Asia
- Automobile
- Bangladesh
- Biological Inventions
- bLAWgathon
- Brand Valuation
- Competition Law
- Constitutional Law
- Consumer Law
- Copyright
- Copyright Infringement
- Copyright Litigation
- Corporate Law
- Counterfeiting
- Covid
- Design
- Digital Right Management
- Educational Conferences/ Seminar
- Fashion Law
- Hi Tech Patent Commercialisation
- Hi Tech Patent Litigation
- India
- Indonesia
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property Protection
- IP Commercialization
- IP Licensing
- IP Litigation
- IP Practice in India
- IPAB
- IPAB Decisions
- Legal Issues
- Licensing
- Media & Entertainment Law
- Myanmar
- NCLT
- NEPAL
- News & Updates
- Patent Act
- Patent Commercialisation
- Patent Filing
- patent infringement
- Patent Licensing
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Marketing
- Patent Opposition
- Patent Rule Amendment
- Patents
- pharma
- Pharma- biotech- Patent Commercialisation
- Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations
- Section 3(D)
- Signapore
- Social Media
- Sports Law
- TAX
- Technology
- Telecom Law
- Trademark
- Trademark Litigation
- Uncategorized
- USPTO
- Vietnam
Interpretation of the Term “Aggrieved Person” Under Section 47 of Trade Mark Act, 1999
17th March, 2016 - 6:46 am
Categories:
India
IPAB
IPAB Decisions
News & Updates
Trademark
0 Comments The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case Adidas AG v Union of India and Anr vide W.P.(C) 3125/2013 set aside the impugned ex parte order by IPAB dated 28th December 2012 and remanded the matter to IPAB for fresh consideration. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE: In the instant case, Petitioner has trademark “RESPONSE” … Continue reading Interpretation of the Term “Aggrieved Person” Under Section 47 of Trade Mark Act, 1999
Read more »