top of page

INSIGHTS
Search


The “Pe” Trademark Debate: Analysing the Delhi High Court’s Decision in PhonePe v. Ezy Services & Anr
Introduction India has witnessed an extraordinary expansion in its digital payments ecosystem over the past decade. With numerous fintech companies entering the market, establishing a unique brand identity has become increasingly important. As competition grows, intellectual property disputes particularly those relating to trademarks have also become more common. One such dispute arose between PhonePe and BharatPe before the Delhi High Court. The controversy centred on whethe
5 hours ago5 min read


Best Efforts’ Vs. ‘Reasonable Efforts’: Why One Word Can Shift Millions in Liability
Introduction Parties entering into contracts in any scenario have the aim of achieving the final result to its finest form, and to accomplish the required task, the contract imposes obligations on the parties to perform and deliver it in a certain way, as per their ability. So where precision matters, a single word in such a commercial contract can represent the nature and level of the obligation and set a standard for the parties, which can lead to consequences, whether it b
24 hours ago7 min read


Judicial Evolution of Groundless Threats Remedy
Section 60 of the Copyright Act, 1957 provides a unique statutory shield against baseless infringement allegations, allowing aggrieved parties to seek declaratory relief, injunctions, and damages when copyright owners issue threats without genuine basis. The Delhi High Court’s ruling in Associated Broadcasting Co. Ltd. v. Google LLC exemplifies this provision’s contemporary relevance, particularly amid digital platform disputes. Statutory Framework Section 60 empowers “any pe
1 day ago4 min read
bottom of page
