- AI
- Air Pollution
- Arbitration
- Asia
- Automobile
- Bangladesh
- Banking
- Biodiversity
- Biological Inventions
- bLAWgathon
- Brand Valuation
- Business
- Celebrity Rights
- Company Act
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional Law
- Consumer Law
- Consumer Protection Authority
- Copyright
- Copyright Infringement
- Copyright Litigation
- Corporate Law
- Counterfeiting
- Covid
- Cybersquatting
- Design
- Digital Media
- Digital Right Management
- Dispute
- Educational Conferences/ Seminar
- Environment Law Practice
- ESIC Act
- EX-Parte
- Farmer Right
- Fashion Law
- FDI
- FERs
- Foreign filing license
- Foreign Law
- Gaming Industry
- GDPR
- Geographical Indication (GI)
- GIg Economy
- Hi Tech Patent Commercialisation
- Hi Tech Patent Litigation
- IBC
- India
- Indian Contract Act
- Indonesia
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property Protection
- IP Commercialization
- IP Licensing
- IP Litigation
- IP Practice in India
- IPAB
- IPAB Decisions
- IT Act
- IVF technique
- Judiciary
- Khadi Industries
- labour Law
- Legal Case
- Legal Issues
- Lex Causae
- Licensing
- Live-in relationships
- Lok Sabha Bill
- Marriage Act
- Maternity Benefit Act
- Media & Entertainment Law
- Mediation Act
- Member of Parliament
- Mergers & Acquisition
- Myanmar
- NCLT
- NEPAL
- News & Updates
- Non-Disclosure Agreement
- Online Gaming
- Patent Act
- Patent Commercialisation
- Patent Fess
- Patent Filing
- patent infringement
- Patent Landscape
- Patent Licensing
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Marketing
- Patent Opposition
- Patent Rule Amendment
- Patents
- Personality rights
- pharma
- Pharma- biotech- Patent Commercialisation
- Pharma/Biotech Patent Litigations
- Pollution
- Posh Act
- Protection of SMEs
- RERA
- Sarfaesi Act
- Section 3(D)
- Signapore
- Social Media
- Sports Law
- Stamp Duty
- Stock Exchange
- Surrogacy in India
- TAX
- Technology
- Telecom Law
- Telecommunications
- Thailand
- Trademark
- Trademark Infringement
- Trademark Litigation
- Trademark Registration in Foreign
- Traditional Knowledge
- UAE
- Uncategorized
- USPTO
- Vietnam
- WIPO
- Women Empower
INTRODUCTORY ANALYSIS
The very notion of sovereignty is, by its nature, closely related to the birth and growth of the modern nation-state system. The Westphalian model of international relations, dating back to the 17th century, had definitely established the concept of state sovereignty as the basis of the international order. The Westphalian model, that placed the sovereign state at the center of international relations, held the monopoly on governing its territory and people free from interference from other states.
The principle of territorial integrity and the exclusive right to use legitimate force within its territory is the core of sovereignty in the modern state. The state, as the ultimate political authority, has a capacity to enact and enforce laws, raise taxes, and protect the sovereignty from both internal and external threats. This concentration of power within the state was deemed necessary for maintaining social order, creating national unity, and ensuring the security of the people.
However, the character of state sovereignty has changed in contemporary times, especially in the context of globalization and increasing interdependence of the global landscape. The proliferation of international organizations, expansion of transnational corporations, and advent of global issues such as climate change and terrorism have collectively put pressure on the conventional understanding of state sovereignty.
Increasingly, today nations need to balance sovereignty and independent decision-making on the one hand, with international cooperation and collective action on the other. The imperatives of global governance institutions, international rules and treaties, and transnational issues now circumscribe the unqualified sovereignty of the nation-state.
Another area is the influence of popular sovereignty, which claims that the government derives its source of power from the people. Such a development increases the demand by governments to derive their legitimacy not only from the fact that they are sovereign powers but from the consent and participation of their citizens.
Despite these barriers, the principle of state sovereignty remains an integral part of the international structure. The modern state remains the paramount unit of political entity, and its sovereignty remains the basis of recognition and legitimacy of its authority both at home and abroad. However, the nature of sovereignty has evolved, and it has become imperative for states to operate in a more complex and integrated international system.
Thus, given current international political developments, state sovereignty forms that remain essential for active arguments and bargaining over function as well as substance are faced in the face of continued international and national challenges. Their inter-play poses crucial issues for policymakers as well as researchers and even for publics, engaged in navigating the ever shifting landscape of international relations across the 21st century.
Conclusion
The concept of sovereignty has acted as a key underpinning for the modern nation-state structure, shaping state interaction upon the global scene for several millennia. In essence, sovereignty refers to the supreme and lawful authority of a state to exercise control over its territory and population without interference from an outside authority. This principle has played a key role in the development of the Westphalian model of international relations, as it acknowledged the sovereign state as the prime actor in international affairs.
Like this concept itself, conceptual frameworks of sovereignty have developed progressively, so intricate and diversified. The essence and limits of sovereign authority in this sense have evolved from the Austinian view of sovereignty as an aggregation of centralised, monistic power into pluralist and constitutionalist approaches, which recognize that power comes from multiple sources.
The legal, political, de jure, and de facto forms of sovereignty highlight the subtle nuances and further complications involved in this concept. More relevant to the understanding of state power in practical terms and about what modern nation-states face is the distinction between legal and formal accreditation of sovereignty and the real, practical authority exercised by the state.
Modern states have witnessed a radical transformation in the concept of sovereignty, particularly against the backdrop of globalization and increasing interdependence among nations. As the number of international organizations has increased, as transnational corporations have proliferated, and as global issues have come into prominence, all these factors have interacted to shape the very conception of state sovereignty and therefore create a need for states to reconcile independent authority with demands of international cooperation and collective endeavors.
Furthermore, the concept of popular sovereignty, which bases its argument on the fact that foundational political authority is held by the people, has become very influential in most parts of the world. This has led to an increased emphasis on how the states have to derive their legitimacy from the consent and participation of citizens rather than just appointment as sovereign authorities.
Despite all these barriers the doctrine of sovereignty remains a vital constituent part of international structure. Modern nation-state is considered the most primordial way of political organization, where its sovereignty serves as a basis for recognition and legitimization of authority both on the local and international levels. However, what sovereignty means has changed and, therefore, the states function in a progressively more complex and interconnected international space.
As the international community wrestles with the protracted challenges stemming from the juxtaposition of national agendas and world pressures, the principle and the role of state sovereignty will remain a central issue of vigorous debate and decision-making. Understanding historical development, conceptual approaches, and policy consequences of the principle is imperative for officials, scholars, and common people as they navigate through the turbulent landscape of 21st century international relations.
Author: Amrita Pradhan, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.
References
- Jean Bodin, Six Books of the Commonwealth (M.J. Tooley trans., Basil Blackwell 1955) (1576).
- Hugo Grotius, De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres (Francis W. Kelsey trans., Clarendon Press 1925) (1625).
- Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (Richard Tuck ed., Cambridge Univ. Press 1996) (1651).
- John Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (Wilfrid E. Rumble ed., Cambridge Univ. Press 1995) (1832).
- Leon Duguit, Law in the Modern State (Frida and Harold Laski trans., B.W. Huebsch 1919).
- Hugo Krabbe, The Modern Idea of the State (George H. Sabine & Walter Shephard trans., D. Appleton & Co. 1922).
- D. Lindsey, The Modern Democratic State (Oxford Univ. Press 1943).
- Ernest Barker, Principles of Social and Political Theory (Clarendon Press 1951).
- J. Laski, A Grammar of Politics (George Allen & Unwin Ltd. 1925).
- M. MacIver, The Modern State (Oxford Univ. Press 1926).
- Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract and Discourses (G.D.H. Cole trans., J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd. 1993) (1762).
- Jeremy Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (J.H. Burns & H.L.A. Hart eds., Athlone Press 1970) (1789)